ÉϺ£¸ßУÉç»áѧE-×êÑÐÔº£¨Ð±¦GG£©ÏµÁн²×ù
2014Äê µÚ14½² ×ܵÚ347½²
±êÌ⣺The Axial Age vs. Max Weber¡¯s Comparative Sociology of the World Religions: Methodological Considerations
ÖáÐÄʱÆÚÓëΤ²®µÄÊÀ½ç×ڽ̱ÈÁ¦Éç»áѧ£º²½ÖèÂÛµÄÊÓ½Ç
Ö÷½²ÈË£ºJohn Torpey
City
University
of
New York
(CUNY)
Graduate
Center
Ö÷³ÖÈË: Ê¢ÖÇÃ÷
б¦GGÉç»áѧԺ½²Ê¦
¹¦·ò£º
2014
Äê
6
ÔÂ
27
ÈÕ
10£º00
µØÖ·£ºÐ£±¾²¿A602
Ö÷°ì£ºÉç»áѧԺ
½ÌÓý¾Àú£º
University
of
California
, Berkeley, Department of Sociology. M.A., 1987; Ph.D., 1992 £»Amherst College, Department of Political Science, B. A., magna cum laude, 1981
ר³¤:
Professor, Ph. D. Program in Sociology
£¬Comparative Historical Sociology
£¬The Sociology of Max Weber
£¬Inequality and Social Stratification
£¬Political Sociology
½²×ù¸ÅÒª£ºIn this presentation, I will address the recent debate about Karl Jaspers¡¯ idea of an ¡°axial age,¡± during which several of the world¡¯s major religious traditions were founded, and which Jaspers saw as the occasion when ¡°man as we know him today¡± came into being. I argue that Jaspers¡¯ emphasis on the commonalities of the major traditions (Buddhism, Greek philosophy, Jewish prophecy, and Confucianism) was at odds with Weber¡¯s understanding of these matters, which stressed their differences.
ÐÅÏ¢°ä²¼ ÉϺ£¸ßУÉç»áѧE-×êÑÐÔºÍøÕ¾
********************************************************
Öйú.ÉϺ£.б¦GG·99ºÅB419 Óʱࣺ 200444
B419.(
Shanghai
University
),
99 Shangda Rd.
,
Shanghai, P. R. China, 200444
ÁªÏµÈË£º Ðì·¼Ïã
ÁªÏµµç»°£º021-66135205
µç×ÓÓʼþ£ºxufenfang2008@163.com
********************************************************
